Verdant Law
Washington, DC
1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036
Recent News
Phone
202-828-1233
Washington, DC
1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
OKLearn moreWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.
Disclaimer
TSCA Reform Bill Headed to Full Senate
/in News & Events, TSCA ReformTSCA Reform:
On July 25, the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works passed a 174-page, substantially revised version of Senator Lautenberg’s 2011 Safe Chemicals Act (S.847). The bill was approved along party lines, with all Republicans voting against it. It will now move to the full U.S. Senate for consideration. Since the bill moved out of committee, we are aware of no meaningful progress toward passage of the bill on the floor of the full Senate. Moreover, it is unlikely that a companion bill will be passed in the U.S. House of Representatives prior to the November election. Therefore, we continue to anticipate meaningful TSCA reform efforts in 2013, but not before then. We also expect this amended bill to remain a focal point of future negotiations in both houses.
A copy of the amendment to the bill is available here Final-Amendment-to-S.-847[1]. The original version is available here BILLS-112s847is. Senator Lautenberg’s summary is available here. And a webcast of the committee hearing is available here.
TSCA Fines Announced
/in Enforcement, News & Events, TSCAEPA issued a News Release Monday July 23 announcing fines for violations of TSCA’s recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
The announcement details the following settlements:
See below for the full News Release.
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued complaints seeking civil penalties against three companies for alleged violations of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The alleged violations involved the companies’ failure to comply with EPA’s TSCA section 8 Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) regulations, which require companies to submit accurate data about the production and use of chemical substances manufactured or imported during a calendar year. Under TSCA, penalties can be assessed up to $37,500 per day, per violation.
Formerly known as the IUR, the TSCA Chemical Data Reporting Rule requires the collection of information about existing chemicals on the market by requiring periodic reports about the production and use of chemicals to help understand the risks they may pose to human health and the environment. The data collected by EPA is the most comprehensive source of information for chemicals currently in commerce in the U.S.
The reporting deadline for the 2006 IUR rule ended in March of 2007. EPA’s enforcement efforts have led to 43 civil enforcement actions and approximately $2.3 million dollars in civil penalties against companies that failed to report required chemical data information. The reporting deadline for the 2012 submission period of the Chemical Data Reporting Rule is August 13, 2012.
The three most recent cases are against Chemtura Corporation, Bethlehem Apparatus Company, and Haldor Topsoe, Inc., and resulted in penalties totaling $362,113.
The Chemtura Corporation is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pa. and has a facility located in El Dorado, Arizona. In a May 31, 2012 complaint, EPA alleged that the facility failed to report two chemicals pursuant to the 2006 IUR rule and assessed a penalty of $55,901. The company corrected the violations, paid the penalty and a final order was issued by the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) on June 25, 2012.
During an inspection of the Bethlehem Apparatus Company, located in Hellertown, Pa., EPA found that the facility was in violation of the 2006 IUR Rule for one chemical substance. EPA also determined during the inspection that the company had failed to comply with the export notification requirements as required under TSCA section 12(b) and the import certification requirements as required under TSCA section 13 on a number of occasions for the same chemical substance. The company corrected the violations and paid a $103,433 penalty proposed in a May 31, 2012 complaint.
Haldor Topsoe, Inc., headquartered in Houston, Texas, is subject to a TSCA complaint that was filed on June 20, 2012. The complaint alleged that that the company had violated the 2006 IUR rule for 13 chemical substances. The complaint assessed a proposed penalty of $202,779, which the company paid on July 2, 2012.
More information about the settlements and EPA’s TSCA enforcement program: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/civil/tsca/tscaiur.html
More information about TSCA reporting requirements: http://www.epa.gov/iur/
Phil Moffat to Speak at ASC 2012 Fall Expo on California's Green Chemistry Initiative
/in Green Chemistry, Green Chemistry Regulation, News & EventsGreen Chemistry Regulation:
Verdant is pleased to announce that Philip Moffat will be speaking at the Adhesive and Sealant Council’s 2012 Fall Expo in Louisville, Kentucky. Mr. Moffat will discuss California’s efforts to use regulation to drive “green” innovation in the chemicals and consumer products industries. His presentation, “California’s Green Chemistry Initiative – A Legal Perspective,” will cover the history of the state’s vaunted initiative, the challenges of implementing it into regulation, the current status of the regulations, as well as their projected legal and other impacts to businesses in California, the United States, and abroad. The Fall Expo will be held from October 21- 22 at the Louisville Marriott Downtown. More information is available here.
Verdant Chosen for ABA Team Reviewing Moldova's Draft Chemicals Law
/in Moldova, News & EventsMoldova:
Verdant is pleased to announce that it was selected by the American Bar Association (ABA) to be part of a small team that will provide a legal review of Moldova’s draft law on chemicals, and provide guidance on drafting related legislation.
Verdant founder Philip Moffat said “We are pleased to have the opportunity to assist Moldova’s effort. Our attorneys are experienced in working with the chemical control laws in most of the major markets around the globe, as well as many smaller ones. Catherine Lin, who will be Verdant’s leading contributor, is a recognized expert in the field having previously served as in-house counsel at Pfizer on global chemical control and supply chain management issues.”
Background
The growing world-wide commitment to protect human health and the environment from dangerous chemicals and wastes has been a catalyst for action in many countries and sectors. Due to the cross sectoral nature of chemicals and waste management and the interests of various government ministries and other stakeholders in this area, well-coordinated and integrated management approaches at the national level will achieve maximum impact for the limited resources available worldwide, inclusively in the Republic of Moldova. This includes much improved links to the development planning agenda of the country. The analysis of existing mechanisms for inter-ministerial coordination in the sphere of sound management of chemicals reveals a fragmentary approach to chemicals management in different economic branches, which is an issue that will be directly addressed in this project. In this context, the UNDP “Mainstreaming of Sound Management of Chemicals in National Development Planning Processes” project aims to achieve the mainstreaming SMC priorities into national developments plans in order to strengthen country’s foundational capacities for chemicals and waste management thus minimizing the significant adverse effects of these on human health and the global environment.
Aiming at building capacities for formulation and implementation of SMC policies and fostering sustainable forms of development, the project will achieve its objective through the following outputs referring at:
The project will build-upon the UNDP-UNEP Partnership Initiative methodology to Integrating sound management of chemicals into MDG-based development planning which is a comprehensive approach to mainstreaming environmental sustainability.
National priority issues in the sphere of chemicals management in the Republic of Moldova were identified and reflected in the First National Profile on Chemicals Management in the Republic of Moldova (2008). The National Program on Sound Management of Chemicals was approved and establishes the main objectives of the sound chemicals management system to 2020. The overall aim of the program lies in developing an integrated system of chemicals management being efficient from technical, economic, social and environmental points of view.
The program further envisages harmonization of national legislations with EU legislations and sets up the necessary legal and institutional framework for establishment of Chemicals Agency in the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter referred to as the Agency). The draft Law on Chemicals will develop an integrated approach for chemicals management including import, production, processing, storage, transport, use, disposal/treatment and recycling and will be in line with the relevant international treaties. In this context, UNDP Moldova seeks to hire an international consultant (hereinafter referred to as the “consultant”) to provide legal support for revision of the draft Law on Chemicals and recommendations on relevant secondary legislation in line with EU Directives in the respective area.
Update on TSCA "Reform" – The Summer of Bipartisan Consensus?
/in News & Events, TSCA, TSCA ReformTSCA Reform:
Whether you think the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) needs to be “reformed,” “modernized,” “updated” or simply left alone, you’re probably interested in knowing where Congressional efforts to amend the statute currently stand. Here’s a short update, which is based on our latest understanding. If others have additional details or insights, please feel free to share them with us here at Verdant Law.
Supposedly Senator Lautenberg (D-NJ) has agreed to set aside his current version of the Safe Chemicals Act (S.847) and attempt to achieve consensus with his Republic colleagues on the Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee. Although Senator Lautenberg introduced S.847 in 2011 and has not introduced a similar version in 2012, the bill has remained somewhat of a centerpiece in the negotiations with other EPW Committee members.
While Senator Lautenberg is the leading Democratic negotiator, Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is leading the Republicans’ efforts. Senators James Inhofe (R-OK, Ranking Committee Member), Mike Crapo (R-ID, Ranking Subcommittee Member), and Lamar Alexander (R-TN) are also playing key roles.
Negotiations are supposed to continue over the summer. Around Labor Day, the parties will decide whether to attempt a bipartisan markup of S.847 in Senator Lautenberg’s Superfund, Toxics, and Environmental Health Subcommittee, whether a markup is premature but negotiations should continue, or whether to terminate further negotiations for the remainder of the year. Presumably if negotiations terminate, Senator Lautenberg might reintroduce S.847 and attempt passage in the last weeks of the current congress. Republicans would probably oppose it, but may not be in a position to introduce a viable competing bill.
We at Verdant Law think it’s highly unlikely that consensus will be achieved and a bill passed and signed into law before the November election. However, perhaps this summer’s efforts will point the parties in a direction that eventually leads to a workable solution. (One can dream, right?) Stay tuned.
EPA Announces More Muscular Use of TSCA Section 6
/in News & Events, TSCA, TSCA ReformTSCA/Section 6 restrictions:
June 7, 2012 Jim Jones, Acting Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, announced that EPA plans to use TSCA §6 to ban or restrict the use of chemicals that pose an unreasonable risk. This is an extension of the Administrator’s 2009 Comprehensive Approach to Enhance the Agency’s Current Chemical’s Management Program. At that time, the Agency announced a renewed focus on identifying chemicals of concern and initiating appropriate risk management, including regulatory action to restrict or ban chemicals. Jones’ Office explained that the agency intends to use its existing authority to the best of its ability until Congress enacts TSCA reform. It noted that TSCA reform is one of the Administrator’s highest priorities.
Jones statement was made at the Environmental Council of the States’ State Environmental Protection in 2012 forum. He spoke extemporaneously. For further information, Jones’ Office recommends reviewing the Comprehensive Approach and the Administrator’s Essential Principles for Reform of Chemicals Management Legislation. See also the Administrator’s September 2009 remarks announcing both efforts.
EU Member State Committee Identifies 5 More SVHCs
/in News & Events, REACHREACH/SVHCs/Authorization
During meetings held from June 6 – 8, 2012, the EU’s Member State Committee (MSC) unanimously agreed on the identification of five substances of very high concern (SVHCs). SVHCs are thought to have serious and often irreversible effects on human health and the environment. The five substances identified by the MSC are diborontrioxide and the following four dyes: C.I. Basic Violet 3; C.I.Basic Blue 26; C.I. Solvent Blue 4; and 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-4”-(methylamino)trityl alcohol. The listing for the four dyes will clarify that the substances will only be identified as SVHCs when the concentration of the impurities Michler’s ketone or Michler’s base is equal to or higher than 0.1%.
SVHCs include substances that have one or more of the following hazard characteristics: Carcinogenic, Mutagenic or Toxic for Reproduction (CMR 1,2); Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) or very Persistent and very Bioaccumulative (vPvB); or cause probable serious effects to human health or the environment (e.g. Endocrine Disruptors). REACH, the primary regulation for industrial chemicals, aims at ensuring that the risks resulting from the use of SVHCs are controlled and that the substances are replaced where possible.
The five substances will be added to the Candidate List and may subsequently become subject to authorization under REACH Title VII. When an SVHC becomes subject to authorization, persons using or making it available on the EU market must apply for authorization within a prescribed deadline (i.e., the “sunset date”), seeking approval of nonexempt uses while also including an analysis of possible substitutes. If they can show that the risks from their uses are adequately controlled (except non-threshold CMRs and PBTs/vPvBs), or that the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risks and no suitable alternatives exist, then their uses of the SVHC are “authorized” to continue.
Even without being selected for authorization, inclusion of substances on the Candidate List immediately triggers certain regulatory obligations.
More information about the MSC is available here, and information about the process for identifying SVHCs is available here.
New TSCA Work Plan Chemicals
/in News & Events, Risk Assessment, TSCATSCA/Work Plan for Existing Chemicals/Chemical Risk Assessment
June 1, 2012 EPA announced the addition of 18 chemicals to its work plan for existing chemicals risk assessment. The 18 chemicals include flame retardants, fragrance chemicals, and chlorinated hydrocarbons. Many of these chemicals are potentially carcinogenic, or pose reproductive or developmental toxicity. In addition, some of these chemicals present persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic potential or are found in consumer products. New and existing work plan chemicals are listed on EPA’s website.
As part of the Agency’s strategy to manage existing chemicals (see EPA’s Existing Chemicals Program Strategy (PDF), EPA has been screening chemicals against risk criteria (see e.g., Identifying Priority Chemicals for Review and Assessment). Chemicals are likely to be flagged for further review and assessment if screening indicates:
In the June 1 announcement, EPA solicited unpublished health and safety studies on these chemicals. Research should be submitted to docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-20110-516 by August 31, 2012. Health and safety studies comprise “any study of any effect of a chemical substance or mixture on health or the environment or on both,” including but not limited to:
Risks assessments on the new work plan chemicals will be conducted in 2013 and 2014.
European Chemical Industry Debuts Chemical Combination Screening Tool – Concludes Regulating Individual Chemicals is Usually Adequate
/in News & Events, REACH, Risk AssessmentChemical Mixture Risk Assessment:
May 31, the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) unveiled a tool for assessing the risks posed by chemical combinations: the Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) (see e.g., news release, combination effects tools). MCR compares the toxicity of individual chemicals to the cumulative toxicity of all chemicals in an exposure scenario. Cefic argues that in most exposure scenarios the risk of one or two chemicals contribute nearly all risk of harm. The organization notes that prioritization of chemical combinations is necessary to identify combinations of concern that warrant full risk assessment.
Cefic references Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) as a Tool for Assessing the Value of Performing a Cumulative Risk Assessment (in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health) for full discussion of the application of MCR. The article comprises an investigation of the magnitude of toxicity from multiple chemical exposure that is missed in scenarios where no cumulative risk assessment is conducted. U.S. Geological Survey water quality data were used for the evaluation. From 5 to 81 chemicals were present in the 3,000 samples analyzed. The authors estimate that approximately 20 percent of cumulative toxicity –compared to component chemical toxicity– is missed where cumulative risk assessments are not conducted. However, mixture toxicities were dominated by only a fraction of chemical compounds present.
Because risk is usually driven by one or two chemicals in a combination, Cefic believes that controlling individual substances through the current regulatory schemes will often control the risk from combination exposures.
Cefic notes that MCR is based on the WHO risk assessment framework (see e.g., Combined Exposure Risk Assessment Workshop Report) and relies on cumulative risk assessment theories from the European Scientific Committees (see e.g., Environmental Risk Assessment of Mixtures Symposium).
EPA Draft (IRIS) Ammonia Assessment Available for Public Comment
/in IRIS, News & Events, Risk AssessmentIntegrated Risk Information System (IRIS):
Today, EPA released for a 60-day public comment period the draft IRIS assessment for ammonia. Excerpts from the agency’s press release are provided below, and a copy of the draft assessment is avaialble here.
IRIS is a human health assessment program that evaluates information on health effects that may result from exposure to environmental contaminants. Through the IRIS Program, EPA attempts to provide the highest quality science-based human health assessments to support the Agency’s regulatory activities. The IRIS database is web-accessible and contains information on more than 550 chemical substances. Readers familiar with IRIS will recall the various criticisms of the agency’s evaluation process, which EPA has been attempting to address, as described in further detail here. General background information on IRIS is available here.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 1, 2012
EPA Draft Ammonia Assessment Available for Public Comment
Draft assessment continues agency’s responsiveness to NAS recommendations
WASHINGTON – The U.S Environmental Protection Agency today announced the release of its draft Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) health assessment for ammonia. The draft assessment will be available for public comment for 60 days and will be sent for independent expert peer review.
Ammonia is used in agricultural fertilizers, the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and explosives, water purification, household cleaners, as a refrigerant, and in many industries. Scientific studies show that ammonia can affect the respiratory system. The draft assessment includes an estimate of the amount of ammonia a person can inhale daily throughout a lifetime that is not likely to cause harmful health effects, which is less stringent than the current value for ammonia on IRIS.
The draft IRIS assessment for ammonia represents major progress for EPA in implementing the April 2011 National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommendations for improving IRIS assessments. The draft assessment uses a new streamlined document structure that is more transparent and clear; includes a template for describing the literature search approach; identifies the strengths and weaknesses of analyzed studies; and describes how EPA applied their guidance, methods, and criteria in developing the assessment.
When the assessment is final it will be posted to the IRIS database. IRIS is a publicly available online database that provides high quality science-based human health assessments used to inform the agency’s decisions on protecting public health and the environment.
The IRIS database contains crucial information on more than 550 chemical substances and their impacts on human health. Governments and private entities use data from IRIS in conjunction with exposure information to help characterize the public health risks of chemical substances. These characterizations are then considered in risk management decisions to protect public health.