Company Sues EPA to Block Disclosure of Chemical Identities Under TSCA
A silicates manufacturer is suing EPA to prevent the disclosure of its confidential business information (CBI) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), in what at least one source claims may be a case of first impression under the law.
At issue are the chemical identities of two substances that Burgess Pigment Co. initially failed to substantiate as CBI following the 2016 Lautenberg Amendments to TSCA, which introduced new requirements for companies that seek trade secret protection in their submissions to EPA.
Burgess claims it submitted adequate substantiation once it discovered its oversight, maintained its CBI claim in subsequent filings, and has stayed in “constant contact” with EPA. According to the complaint, if EPA discloses the chemical identities anyway, it would violate the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
“EPA’s unreasonable adherence to form over function caused it to fail to adhere to its regulations requiring nondisclosure of properly substantiated CBI and is otherwise arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law,” the complaint states.
According to the complaint, Burgess was one of many companies that failed to respond to the 2017 rule implementing the new CBI requirements. In 2021, EPA released a rule to reopen the reporting period, but it was never published in the Federal Register.
The case is Burgess Pigment Co. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 5:25-cv-00309 (M.D. Ga.), filed 7/18/25.